Glenn Beck and the LDS Church condemn anti-gay bullying

Anti-gay bullying and the recent gay youth suicides have been making headlines lately. It’s tragic that these things are even issues in the 21st century, but I’m glad the media are drawing attention to them.

I want to share with you a few stories related to anti-gay bullying and gay youth suicides. The first is a video of Fort Worth City Councilman Joel Burns. Fighting back tears, he shared his personal story as a gay man and assured gay teens that “it gets better.” Please watch. His message is an important one.

Continue reading

Something for the ladies: advancing the role of women in Mormonism

I have come to realize just how male-centric this blog is. Women are often most victimized by religion, and yet I very rarely write about women’s issues here. Even the name of the site and the group—SHAFT—is evidence of male bias! (Yes, the phallic innuendo was intentional; men cannot pass up the opportunity to make a penis joke.) It isn’t surprising, then, that only 21% of our readership is female*.

So I figure I ought to do a little something for the ladies in this post.

Molly Muses recently offered a list of small changes the LDS Church could make to advance the role of women in Mormonism. Below are her suggestions:

Continue reading

Mormon sues LDS Church over baptism for the dead injury

From The Onion The Salt Lake Tribune:

A Las Vegas man is suing The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for medical expenses after he injured his back in 2007 performing baptisms for the dead.

In a civil suit filed in 3rd District Court on Wednesday, Daniel Dastrup claims he suffered a severe herniated disk in his lumbar spine after performing about 200 baptism on Aug. 25, 2007. The then 25-year-old claims some of the young men and women he completely immersed in water in the name of the dead weighed as much as 250 pounds.

Continue reading

Did the LDS Church model their ads after Scientology’s?

This will be my last post about the “I am a Mormon” ad campaign, I promise. I have to share this video with you, though:

The above ad is from 2009 and was part of a Scientologist ad campaign. Now compare that to this more recent (and near-identical) LDS commercial. Granted, “I am…” campaigns are nothing new in advertising, and the LDS Church could have come up with theirs independently. Yet even the style of the ads is similar! It really looks as though the LDS Church took a page out of Scientology’s playbook. And there’s nothing egregious about that, I just find it amusing.

But in light of this and yesterday’s post, maybe I’m engaging in parallelomania—seeing parallels where none exist. What do you think?

Update: A friend of mine in the comments wrote that the “I’m a Mormon” ads were thought up in 2006. If true, they were probably not modeled after the Scientology ads, which didn’t air until 2009.

LDS Church launches new ad campaign to rehabilitate its image

From Salon:

If you’re a resident of one of nine seemingly randomly selected mid-sized (mostly) non-coastal American cities, you’re the lucky audience for a new series of commercials advertising… Mormons. They are not quite explicitly ads for the Church of Latter-day Saints, they are just ads for Mormons, themselves. They are about how Mormons are regular people who enjoy things like surfing and riding motorcycles.

Here in New York, there’s no evidence this is happening. But I just spent a week out in the heartland, and it was inescapable. The ads are running in “Baton Rouge, Colorado Springs, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Rochester, Oklahoma City, St. Louis, Tucson and Minneapolis.”

As far as I can tell, these 30-second ads are not yet available online. But here is an extended version of one of the ads:

Continue reading

A 1984 conference talk gets an Orwellian makeover

One of my favorite hobbies is reading old LDS General Conference talks. You’d be forgiven for thinking that sounds boring. Today’s conference talks are usually boring. But that wasn’t always the case. I’m going to start a new series to highlight some of the most interesting conference talks ever given.

The conference talk that will be discussed in this post is one I discovered only a week ago. It’s a 1984 talk given by Elder Ronald Poelman of the Seventy. (Several blogs have written about this talk, and I’m indebted to their analysis.)

Alan over at the Pure Mormonism blog provides a nice summary of Poelman’s talk:

Elder Poelman began his talk by reminding the congregation that there is an important difference between the gospel and the Church. “There is a distinction between them which is significant”, he said, “and it is very important that this distinction be understood.”

Poelman cautioned that failure to distinguish between the two, and to comprehend their proper relationship, could lead to “confusion and misplaced priorities”.

The gospel, he explained, is the substance of the divine plan for personal, individual salvation and exaltation. The Church, on the other hand, is the delivery system that provides the means and resources to implement that plan.

As Elder Poelman explained it, the gospel of Jesus Christ is eternal and unchanging. The Church of Jesus Christ is not. “Policies, programs, and procedures do change from time to time as necessary to fulfill gospel purposes.”

“When we understand the difference between the gospel and the church and the appropriate function of each in our lives, we are much more likely to do the right things for the right reasons.”

Elder Poelman admonished the congregation to remain mindful that every church member has not only the right, but also the obligation to exercise his free agency and receive a personal witness not only of gospel principles, but also of Church practices.

According to Elder Poelman, the ultimate goal of each of us should be to eventually get to that point in our spiritual and intellectual growth where we will no longer need the institutional Church in our lives. Here is how Elder Poelman put it:

“As individually and collectively we increase our knowledge, acceptance, and application of gospel principles, we become less dependent on Church programs. Our lives become gospel centered.”

Pretty tame, no? Apparently not. Poelman’s suggestion that Mormons should distinguish between the Church and the Gospel—a distinction Joseph Smith himself made—was too radical for the Brethren. His saying that spiritually mature members will become “less dependent on Church programs” was likely met with disapproval, too.

Continue reading

Ex-general authority George P. Lee dies

Former LDS General Authority George P. Lee passed away today in Provo at the age of 67.

You’re probably wondering “Who’s that?” and “Why should I care?” In 1975, George P. Lee was called by Spencer W. Kimball to be a member of the First Quorum of the Seventy. This is significant, because Lee was the first (and only) Native American general authority. In 1989, Lee was excommunicated for “apostasy and other conduct unbecoming a member of the Church.” This too is significant, because Lee was the first general authority to be excommunicated since 1943, when Apostle Richard R. Lyman was excommunicated for practicing polygamy.

Lee’s “unbecoming conduct” refers to his attempted molestation of a 12-year-old girl. But of more interest to me–from a Mormon studies perspective—is the charge of apostasy. Lee was upset that President Ezra Taft Benson was phasing out the LDS Church’s Indian Placement Program.

Continue reading

Friendly advice to the LDS Church about homosexuality

The LDS Church gets a lot of grief over its stance on homosexuality. The criticisms are often well-deserved, but rarely constructive.

In the wake of several gay Mormon suicides, concerned Mormons are asking what their church could do to better minister to gay members. Here are what I hope to be a few constructive suggestions:

1. Work out a consistent theology regarding sex. Let me explain. If you’re going to oppose homosexuality on the grounds that it perverts the procreative end of sex, then treat homosexuality as you would other non-procreative acts—like masturbation, heterosexual sodomy, and contraceptive use. In other words, don’t treat homosexuality as a special, excommunicable sin.

(I of course don’t think homosexuality is a sin, but I cannot realistically expect the LDS Church to share my view any time soon).

Continue reading