An Exciting Challenge

I remember the year right before I stopped going to church. It seemed like every month, the bishop would issue a ‘new challenge’ to the congregation.  Ok, so it wasn’t so much a new challenge, as the same challenge over and over again.

“Ok, ward, this year, we’re going to read the Book of Mormon straight through!”

“But I just barely finished it….”

“Don’t care! Read it again!”

So, in the vein of my old bishop, I am going to issue all of you a challenge. Hopefully this will be a little more enlightening, and exciting, than reading the BoM. (Chloroform in print, as Mark Twain put it.) I challenge all of you to read a book this year that you disagree with. All the way through, no skipping the boring parts. If your ideas and beliefs are solid, then you should have no problems with this. If your ideas need some tweaking, that’s okay. You will have learned something.

Personally, I think I will be reading either Atlas Shrugged or The Fountainhead. I despise Ayn Rand. *ducks to avoid flung tomato*  I don’t care if you guys like her, I don’t, so feel free to tell me what ideas/authors you disagree with.

What are you guys going to read?

Church group in Haiti Hurts, not Helps

A group of ten Baptists volunteers from Idaho traveled to Haiti to try and help the newly orphaned children. Sounds like a good cause, right? Ah, but of course there is a catch. Their “rescue” involved taking children from the country, without the government’s permission. For the record, that isn’t charity. It’s human trafficking.

The most disturbing thing about this is that not all of these kids were orphans. And these people knew it.

The orphanage where the children were later taken said some of the kids have living parents, who were apparently told the children were going on a holiday from the post-quake misery……

One [8-year-old] girl was crying, and saying, “I am not an orphan. I still have my parents.”

Laura Silsby the groups spokesperson, claimed that she hadn’t been following news reports while in Haiti, and didn’t think she needed the Haitian government’s permission to take them out of the country. This statement seems either dishonest, or woefully ignorant. Did she really think she could just haul children out of the country and their government wouldn’t care? I can’t claim to know much about the Haitian government; it’s not exactly a common avenue of study for most of us. But despite what Silsby seems to think, the Haitian people don’t live in free-for-all anarchy. They have laws, leaders. They have a prime minister. It strikes me as somewhat racist to assume that Haiti won’t have rules about kidnapping it’s children.

An article on NPR brings up the idea that some families may have given over their kids willingly, to have a chance at a better life. It isn’t unheard of in third world countries like Haiti.

Marie Rita Pierre said, “I would allow one of these groups to take one of my children. My youngest daughter wants to go to university. We can’t help her. I think its good groups come here to take kids, even though most of the time they will lose touch with their families.”

That is an extremely difficult decision fort a parent to make. And while this may have been the case for some of the children, what about the parents who were told their kids were “going on a holiday”? A holiday implies they will return safe and sound to their families once the country is more stable. Not given to strangers looking to do some kidnapping for Christ.

The group claims they were only trying to do what is right. I have no doubt the mean it. The problem is, their warped ideal of what is “right” is highly subjective. They feel that taking little kids from their parents and placing them with Christian families is right.

“One of the reasons that our church wanted to help is because we believe that Christ has asked us to take the gospel of Jesus Christ to the whole world, and that includes children,” Henry, the senior pastor, said.

However, I feel this is wrong. As do the Haitian government, the local religious leaders, and pretty much anyone with a sense of decency. Max Beauvoir, head of Haiti’s Voodoo Priest’s Association, summed it up quite nicely:

“There are many who come here with religious ideas that belong more in the time of the Inquisition. These types of people believe they need to save our souls and our bodies from ourselves. We need compassion, not proselytizing now, and we need aid — not just aid going to people of the Christian faith.”

If you still want to defend these people, do this for me: I want you to imagine that you are a parent of one of these kids. Your home has been destroyed. Fire, screaming, smoke. Nearly everyone you know and love is dead. You stumble from the wreckage with what’s left of your  family, looking for help. Somehow, in the panic, your child dissapears. There by your side one moment, then gone the next. Imagine the panic at losing your only surving loved one, the last thing you had to cling to. Or even worse, what if some rescuers volunteered to take your baby somewhere safe, until things calmed down. You are so grateful to these kind people, so selflessly helping you, until you find out your baby is in an orphanage, and they had no intention of bringing them home.  How would you feel?

Predjudice is Ugliest in Children.

For those of you who don’t know, I make my living as a substitute teacher. I’m sure most of you find the idea appaling, but I really enjoy getting to work with kids. My favorite age group to sub for is elementary school. I find their enthusiasm and happiness refreshing. Yesterday was art day, and I was having fun walking through the groups of children, looking at their drawings and talking with the kids. As I passed by one group of second graders, I heard the following conversation,

Kid 1: Where do you go to church?

Kid 2: I don’t go to church.

Kid 1: If you don’t go to church, that means you don’t love everyone. It means you hate me.

Kid 2 just ducked his head and kept coloring, while the rest of the table continued to question him. I could see his cheeks turn red in embarrassment. This broke my heart.  I love teaching little kids because of their love and acceptance towards everyone. Somehow, this cute little girl had lost these qualities.

I have made it a point to avoid all discussions of religion at school. I am a teacher, and it would be inappropriate. However, I couldn’t just let this kind of bullying slide. I took a seat at the end of the table, and started coloring with them. I hoped my presence would be enough to stop the conversation, but apparently I’m not exactly an intimidating figure.  The kids kept badgering the little the boy, who was holding his own.

“You can’t love everyone if you’re not Mormon,” insisted the little girl. Her face was twisted unpleasantly in anger.

“Nuh uh,” said the little boy, “(a certain teacher) isn’t Mormon.”

It’s true. The teacher in question is Catholic, and she is one of the greatest people I know. The little girl was blown away. In her mind, anyone who was not Mormon should have fangs and and horns, apparently. She went back to coloring with a dazed look, as if her world had been fundimentally shaken. I can’t blame this little girl for her predujice. She’s 9. She doesn’t know any better. The fault lies with her parents and Sunday school teachers. Where are the lessons about loving thy neighbor? The story about the good Samaritan? I don’t know if they blatantly told her that non-Mormons aren’t as good as them, or it was implied, but either way is unnaceptable. I would feel just as horrified about a little girl who said that all Christians are stupid. Or a little kid who said that blacks are inferior to whites. Prejudice of any kind is wrong to instill in a child, and all of us should know better.

However, I do have hope for this little girl. She learned an important lesson when she realized she couldnt’ tell the Mormons from the Non-Mormons. She couldn’t pick out her fellows by “their special glow” or their “spirit”.  I am hopeful that she will realize that everyone is deserving of respect and love, no matter what their beliefs. I hope all of us can realize that too.

Top Ten Amazon Reviews for the Bible

Hilarious, short and to the point. Without further ado, I present ten reviews of the King James Bible, found on Amazon.com

1. “Excellent Special FX throughout”
2. “The best fantasy epic since Lord of the Rings”
3. “There aren’t enough good fights”
4. “Three stars, because the paper was too thin”
5. “One of the most disjointed novels I’ve read in a long while”
6. “Almost preachy in tone”
7. “Good ending”
8. “The Lord hath no scorn like the scorn reserved for one-star reviewers”
9. “Who wrote this thing, Michael Moore?”
10. “Definitely not his best work”

Move over, Spaghetti Monster.

This is by far the coolest neo-religion I have ever come across. Our deity’s name is Steve. He is a fruit bat, and he is beautiful. Here is the founder’s own story of how Steve came to be.

*Warning: There is some strong language, as I have left it just as the author first published. Read at your own risk if you are easily offended.* Continue reading

Civic Awareness Debate

On Monday around noon, I was lucky enough to catch the debate being held for Civic Awareness Week. I hadn’t been aware of the debate beforehand, I just happened to be getting lunch at the time, and thought I’d check it out. I’m really glad I did, because it was one of the best debates I’ve seen in a long time. There was a representative from College Democrats, Republicans, Libertarions, and suprisingly, the GLBTA services. I was a bit confused when I saw that at first. They have their own party now? Is is possible to vote straight-ticket gay? How ironic would that be? But, as I learned later, it was not meant to be a solely political debate. There was supposed to be another group represented, but the GLBTA just happened to be the only other group who showed besides the political ones.

The ASUSU people had a list of questions for the panel of representatives. The topics included the war in Iraq, health care reform, gay marriage, etc. The usual list of questions you would expect. For the most part, everyone’s answers were very rational and well thought out. All the speakers made sure to distinguish their personal opinions from their groups opinions, which I thought was fantastic. Even the Republican was sounding level headed and reasonable. (Sorry guys, you usually kind of annoy me. It’s the truth.) Until, of course, it got to gay marriage. Continue reading